alchemi183 wrote:I'm not aware of any problems up to this point, but I feel it's a good idea to list some general content rules ... (etc.)
An agreement and a caveat ... all in the spirit of contributing to the Milovana community:
First, the agreement. Totally! Yes, I concur, that these rules are good to follow. In fact, I always think it's a good idea to police and to self-police any "adult" content anywhere, and to publicize your own rules. IMO, taking this simple step doesn't necessarily make everything "perfect" for this porn-sharing community. But it does, IMO, make it less likely that the organization (website; creators; owners; members) will be targets of further investigation by legitimate authorities, should an investigation take place for any reason in the future. So, it's sensible, though not perfect. Thus, I am glad you thought of doing this.
But, why are you choosing to use Empornium's list instead of Milovana's? I'm a little worried. Obviously, I am a member of Milovana. Additionally, I am also a member of Empornium, in good standing (heck, today my Emp ratio is even good right now too!). However, recently I have come to realize that some (many? most?) members of Milovana and the CH-sharing community are not necessarily particularly positively disposed toward Empornium. I believe the cause has something to do with an "exclusivity" feeling they get from Empornium in general, coupled with the fact that new registrations there have been denied for several months, almost a year now. You may (MAYBE ...) be putting yourself in for unnecessary scrutiny or criticism at Milovana by interpolating an Empornium document into a Milovana thread. (By the way, I state this while recognizing, of course, that you, Alchemi183, are not necessarily a moderator of Milovana for all aspects, nor a creator of Milovana's rules, but merely someone who is seeking to create efficiently some useful rules merely for his own single -- albeit rather helpful and appreciated -- thread.) Thus, I am worrying FOR you (perhaps excessively?) by reminding you that Emp isn't necessarily the best source for Milovana rules or quasi-requirements.
I'd say, leave as is (just my opinion), don't bother with fixer-uppers to this post or thread, BUT if a firestorm ensues, then you'll maybe know what part of the content may have given rise to what part of any future complaints.
And ... that took me WAY too many words to say. It already feels overly political ... sorry if I created a tempest in a teapot, or opened a Pandora's box, or can of worms ... or ... uh ... moved a mountain to Mohammed's molehill or ...