Stupid Breast Augmentation

[Tittyluvr1334]

We'll have to agree to completely disagree on this one Cybertoad. Madison Ivy IMO (status post augmentation) is one of the most Delicious looking starlets ever, and I love the way she looks now.

Someone earlier mentioned Sunny Leone - yes FTW, she has the best natural looking post-augmentation and IMO is perfect looking. And yes I do prefer that look to the domes that are bolted on like the first few pictures on this topic.

[fapmandoo]

I'm a huge proponent of natural breasts (natural everything, really), so most of the "after" pictures posted in this thread do not appeal to me. I think that fake tits can look great on a girl, but the implants need to be at least borderline proportional with the girl's body and look at least somewhat real. It all depends on the surgeon and whether the girl has any understanding of bodily aesthetics. I'm actually surprised at how many people are really into the stereotypical porn star bimbo look. As far as I'm concerned, most porn actresses look best in their earliest appearances, before the fake tits. Jenna Jameson, for instance, already had large, perfectly shaped natural breasts in her earliest films, and she displayed a smoldering, youthful sexuality that was virtually unparalleled at the time. She was still hot later on, but it just wasn't the same after she got implants. The porn star life, the drugs, the partying, the plastic surgery, ages a woman rapidly, and a lot of hot women in the public eye, porn star or not, mistakenly make drastic changes to their appearances in an effort to keep themselves looking young and hot and relevant; their efforts almost always make them age prematurely. Weirdo haircuts, over-tattooing, implants, etc. I can understand getting a breast lift after 30, or getting implants if you actually have small breasts, but generally, messing with a young chick's tits is unnecessary.

Of course, that's just personal taste. While porn is obviously fantasy, I'm turned on the most by women and scenarios that are realistic and which reflect many of my own real life experiences. I can comfortably say that there is nothing more divine on this planet, sex-wise, than being with a pretty college-aged girl with large, perky natural breasts. I was lucky enough to sleep with a handful of girls that looked like that back in my college days, and porn stars that fit that description (18-22ish, flat stomach, D cup or bigger natural tits, in reasonably good shape, with a girl next door attitude) are usually the hottest ones out there, and usually go downhill from there. The same is true of famous women who rely on their looks, a few notable exceptiona notwithstanding. I mean, Kate Upton at age 19, in her 2011 si swimsuit and catwalk videos, looks fresher and sexier than she does today by leaps and bounds, and she's only 24 today. Britney Spears's truly sexy days were basically done by 2005. Lindsay Lohan was barely into "legal" territory before she completely fell apart, etc. The combination of father time and fame is usually not a good one.

[book_guy]

Heh, if I had all the time I wanted just to play on the internet, I think I might make an exhaustive search for "better after than before" breast-augmentation pictures. Create a blog, curate the photos, be the master of good-boob-jobs. There are SOME augmentations out there that are either undetectable or improvements even when detectable, I'm sure we'd all agree. The fun part would be, finding out who likes which ones.

I have a theory about Dani Jensen and her physical type. It takes a bit of explaining, but, I think it's not that she wanted bigger tits, as much as she wanted more symmetrical curves. I think that many women tend to want their proportions to be 3:2:3 :: bust:waist:hips, or in that range. She was naturally hippy but small-breasted. Often the one thing that might make a small-breasted strong-thigh-and-hip woman look more proportionate (according to warped modern tastes) would be, losing a lot of weight off of her belly and thighs. Then you would end up with an athletic but also small-breasted and strong-thigh-and-ass woman. This is "sexy" in an evolutionary-biology sort of way, but not something that is always preferred in the modern photogenic world. So it's possible that Dani Jensen was seeing her stomach as the unappealing part, and in order to appease her need for symmetrical curves and a sense of visual propriety (as created by the media empire in which we all live, these days) she could either try to cut out her ass, thighs, and belly over several years of exercise; or she could increase her tits overnight and keep what she felt was "already good enough" belly and thighs. They were (in her mind) the PROBLEM, but were also NOT THE PROBLEM Trying to make items A, B, and C all proportionate to one another, it would have made the most sense to bring all three in line with one another by modifying each subtly; but instead, she has addressed only one, and, given the static fixity of the other two, she had to undergo a more extreme change to that one, in order to make the one match the other two. It was like, given the few surgical or exercise options available, and given the problem as she perceived it (rightly or wrongly), what was her most rational solution?

In general, I'm often surprised at how many women (especially less experienced younger women, for example of college age) just have NO CLUE what turns a guy on. They tend to notice heavy make-up on a face as though it were "very beautiful" and then tend not to notice the distinction between waggly slabs of belly-fat and sharp-as-rocks abdominal muscles. They're like, "but I thought men liked curves" to which I've often imagined myself responding, "Yes, but not when they're on her ANKLES AND KNEES ...". I think there's a type of willful blindness going on, in which women's perceptions of women's beauty in the eyes of men is pro-actively anti-male. So you end up with people like Pam Anderson willing to make herself LESS appealing in order to be MORE sexy and concurrently MORE plastic-looking in order to appear MORE FEMININE. Odd contradictions ... and by the way, there's the problem of the camera "adding weight" of course; and frankly I'd bone Pam Anderson with or without her fake tits strapped onto her chest, either way. So why was she bothering to augment what didn't need improvement?

Just some thoughts.

[book_guy]

Or maybe this is the mistake she made.

A beautiful, natural breast has 45% of its volume above the nipple and 55% below the nipple. The slope of the breast above the nipple (UPS) is straight. The curve of the breast below the nipple(LPC) is round and full. The nipple points slightly upwards.

This is the shape preferred by over 86% of people, both male and female and of all ages.

Dr. Mallucci points out that an over full, round upper breast shape is not considered natural, attractive or desirable.

from http://cosmeticplasticsurgery.com.au/breast/

[book_guy]

So ... uh ... best "natural"-looking augmented breasts in the porn world? Or, to ask differently, if you HATE fake tits, whose fake tits don't bother you at all?

By the way: Talking just about the tits, here, not the whole person. I can concede that Madison Ivy post-augmentation is smoking-hot! Yessir! But I still don't think her tits look particularly "natural". It's something about how she manages to combine the sultry look in her eyes, and the properly sized tits, and the whole package deal, that makes the fakery work out pretty successfully. I don't think just any old chick with the same tits would be as successful with them. Similar for Christy Mack:



I give Madison Ivy, Christy Mack, and Bonnie Rotten positive marks as "chick who has obviously fake bolt-on tits but nevertheless remains utterly hot to me." To Sunny Leone, however, I give different points, as "chick whose fake tits don't seem like obviously fake bolt-ons and therefore she nevertheless remains utterly hot to me." Who is your Sunny?

[lestrian]

Ava Addams looked good both before and after.

[book_guy]

Ava Addams looked good both before and after.

Wow that's a surprise to me. I think of hers as among the most "I don't want to look human any more" of all of the breast-implants. So, it's not like they're "stealth implants" going on there ...

[Nipps]

Ava Addams looked good both before and after.

Wow that's a surprise to me. I think of hers as among the most "I don't want to look human any more" of all of the breast-implants. So, it's not like they're "stealth implants" going on there ...

I think of hers as the best fake tits in porn, hell even just tits in general. To be honest this thread is falling under the category "stop liking things I don't like" and is slightly condescending. I for one can't stand young/underage looking girls, I even find it a huge turnoff, but I don't go making threads about it on a forum that is about creativity and sharing.

[mowlboon]

Ava Addams looked good both before and after.

Wow that's a surprise to me. I think of hers as among the most "I don't want to look human any more" of all of the breast-implants. So, it's not like they're "stealth implants" going on there ...

while I'm half with you I have to say they could be a little bit smaller and they would be absolutely amazing! But the way they look now is still fine I think.

I think of hers as the best fake tits in porn, hell even just tits in general. To be honest this thread is falling under the category "stop liking things I don't like" and is slightly condescending. I for one can't stand young/underage looking girls, I even find it a huge turnoff, but I don't go making threads about it on a forum that is about creativity and sharing.

Also true, if people like these boobs ( ) let them like it, I for my part am also not into young girls (unless they don't look like 14 y/o rather like 20ish) besides some exception tbh. dat ass tho

[fapmandoo]

Ava Addams looked good both before and after.

Wow that's a surprise to me. I think of hers as among the most "I don't want to look human any more" of all of the breast-implants. So, it's not like they're "stealth implants" going on there ...

I think of hers as the best fake tits in porn, hell even just tits in general. To be honest this thread is falling under the category "stop liking things I don't like" and is slightly condescending. I for one can't stand young/underage looking girls, I even find it a huge turnoff, but I don't go making threads about it on a forum that is about creativity and sharing.

I don't think this thread is condescending at all. Book_guy is merely expressing his opinion that porn stars have a tendency to get either poorly-done or wildly disproportional breast augmentations, or both. His viewpoint is confirmed by reality to a great extent. It's pretty obvious that most porn stars didn't go under the knife with the best plastic surgeons.

No one in this thread has been proclaiming their love for super-jailbait Lolita porn, or for flat-chested women. I suppose I can only speak for myself, but I think women with naturally large breasts, both in porn and in real life, are the biggest turn-ons, and I've expressed the same in this thread. I also think that women who are already reasonably well-endowed (i.e. C/D cup) are usually not improving on anything by getting implants unless there was something else wrong with them aesthetically speaking. I don't know if that's how book_guy thinks, but I doubt anyone here is trying to dissuade you from liking what you like.

Moreover, someone proclaiming that they like young, naturally large-breasted women is a far cry from saying that one likes the excessively young-looking Riley Reid type of porn star. If you're instead saying you don't like chicks in the 18-22 age range regardless of how they're built, more power to you I suppose. If that's the case, you're probably in a tiny minority of men, because women in that age range display the most signs of fertility and beauty simply from a biological perspective. If anything, it's no longer politically correct to declare that you prefer women in this age range, which is mind-boggling considering that men are by and large wired to be attracted to them the most. On a societal level, there's a hell of a lot more "stop liking what you like" directed to people with my preferences than there are to people with your preferences.

[book_guy]

Well, maybe he didn't mean "condescending" but I get his point ... so, without further ado ... SORRY.

Yes, I'm sorry if I started to sound like "this is what YOU are SUPPOSED to like" rather than remaining within the "this is what I personally like, regardless of what you or anyone else has a right to like." I apologize for that wrong-headed possibility of a "supposed-to", if it's in any of my posts, or even if it's NOT there but could reasonably be inferred to be there. I feel like here at a sexuality-forum on the internet, we pretty much have to respect everyone else's choices, and we certainly OUGHT to respect them. I'm usually rather overt about stating that in my posts -- something like "Oh, by the way, I'm not JUDGING other people's voluntary choices or innate preferences, I'm just saying that these are MINE and those are THEIRS and presently we don't have preferences or choices that overlap or other-presently we DO ..." etc. etc.. My failure was, to fail to include this type of statement earlier or more regularly in this thread.

Personally, what I was looking for, was what I personally, within my own preferences, subjectively, would like and would consider to be good candidates for "best fake-tits" or "best enhancements" and, in fulfilling my preferences, I wouldn't be looking to denigrate other people's preferences (unless those preferences are obviously totally illegal or freakishly anti-human or somehow hint at exploitation or intended abuse that would not stay solely within the fantasy-realm and that might actually cross over into the reality-realm).

Meh ... wuddever ... nice tits:



... but are they REAL ... ?

[Nipps]

Perhaps condescending is a poor choice of a word, english is after all my third language. I just felt the thread was turning into fake-titty-bashing and taking a turn to something not very constructive for this forum. Anyways, nice titties there indeed! :)

[Tittyluvr1334]

... but are they REAL ... ?

To which I so readily quip: WHO CARES? They are fantastic! You never hear anyone ask if the Mona Lisa was painted with real paint or on a real canvas! Nope - we just marvel at it's fantastic beauty. Personally I don't care if this gal in this photo had them enhanced or not - they look incredible, and I'm sure they taste the same either way!

[ComboNo1]

Perhaps condescending is a poor choice of a word, english is after all my third language.

About English .... it's my first and ONLY language, and there are times I feel like I'm struggling with it. So good for you for knowing three!

[craftytouch]

Dani Jensen, what was she thinking?
Bonnie Rotten needed em' she had little saggy boobs at 19.
Rebeca linares Noooo!
Tanner mayes now joined the club of not needed. But she's a bsket case anyway, just got back into porn and already she's drunk or high as a kite getting fucked by several black dudes. Her way back into porn was doing something she didn't do before, which was black guys. So she has to get high to do it.
Aletta Ocean did need em the first time. She went crazy w/ plastic surgery. First boob job was good, second was better, but nose job, butt job, chin job, etc no good.

All my opionion.
Some girls I dig having huge fake tits, but they would just be toys for me. Any gf would have natural tits and be on the small side. Piper Perri is my lil goddess. But since she had a kid, smokes too much pot, and doesn't really exercise I fear her lil tits will sag soon and she'll b off to the doc.

How bout the girls who gain weight and get a boob job to off set the weight. Then gain more weight and get them bigger. Sophie Dee I'm pointing at you.