"Realistic" CGI models in webteases - thoughts ?

All about the past, current and future webteases and the art of webteasing in general.
---
Post Reply
User avatar
rebekeplex
Explorer At Heart
Explorer At Heart
Posts: 126
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2016 5:59 pm
Gender: Male
Sexual Orientation: Straight

"Realistic" CGI models in webteases - thoughts ?

Post by rebekeplex »

Hey guys,

This might take a while before I get to my main point here, but I wanted to give a little bit of a background.

Lately I was thinking about how hard it is for me to get pictures for my webteases, either because I can't find the full photosets (and being limited to 12-16 pictures is annoying) or because some models only have 1-2 photosets where they look good for the concept of my tease. And on top of that, the photosets get removed from sites like imagefap in the middle of me making the tease and all my effort is basically doomed for the time being (but the photosets usually don't re-appear...). This situation ruined my last two projects and I'm feeling a bit fed up by it. It can be prevented to a degree, but that's not what I came here to talk about...

So, being able make my own CGI outputs could help me overcome some of the problems I mentioned earlier. Few years back I discovered game called "Virtually Jenna", then the same company released "3D Sexvilla 2" (which you had to spend money on) and then there was a pirated version of the game called "The Klub 17" which had all the content on the forums for free (shout-out to WhiteRabbit if he's somewhere around here :wave: ). Few days ago I went to the forum to check current state of the game and to my surprise it didn't look as great as I remembered - obviously. So I started looking for an alternative game and I found one which looked pretty decent, called "Honey Select". I spent quite some time to get some mods, models and other content before I started to consider it looking good.

THE MAIN POINT - HERE

I experimented with the output quality of the pictures and I was not satisfied with the .JPG outputs compared to the .PNG ones. Unfortunately the webteases doesn't accept the .PNG pictures so I tried to find compromise between time consumption of postprocessing the pictures and the picture quality. Not to mention that the after uploading the pictures to the webtease interface the quality dropped even more.

Here are 2 examples of pictures that took little to no time to make with let's say OK quality.
Spoiler: show
ab7f7ae8b3cc5d4fcc29663e22b0a4f13e636b79.jpg
ab7f7ae8b3cc5d4fcc29663e22b0a4f13e636b79.jpg (39.96 KiB) Viewed 3767 times
23c3d49bea790768d0ec65812c40c6e7d18c8c2d.jpg
23c3d49bea790768d0ec65812c40c6e7d18c8c2d.jpg (45.79 KiB) Viewed 3766 times
Let me know if pictures with more or less the same quality look good to you and if you would like to see a webtease with pictures of that kind. Also please note that the output quality might be hardware-dependant, but with my current build I can't push it much further without sacrificing the time consumption aspect.

There is also a possibility that someone on this forum is by far more experienced with Honey Select and could maybe give me some tips according to which mods are better than others and so on (there is a dedicated forum for that on Hongfire, but I didn't dig there toooo thoroughly).

Apart from the quality of the pictures:
  • Speaking of models being "realistic"... :-D by that I mean the body parts being somewhat proportional and comparable to an actual (idealized) human body and not having legs for 2/3 of the lenght of the body, grapefruit sized eyeballs and so on...
  • Everything is uncensored if that's what you were curious about
  • I found some models from fantasy genres like Dead or Alive, Naruto and some others which I only recognized the face of, but I can't really tell which game / movie it comes from
Let me know what you think or what is your experience with similar things, any inputs from you guys are appreciated (women's oppinion matters too ! :-D )
strokerboy3
Explorer
Explorer
Posts: 92
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 5:53 pm
Gender: Male
Sexual Orientation: Straight
I am a: Submissive
Location: New York

Re: "Realistic" CGI models in webteases - thoughts ?

Post by strokerboy3 »

I've always loved the Sex Mage World stuff written by salamando. I would love to see some of his stories illustrated with your stuff. Hopefully that's something that would interest you!
spaisin
Explorer At Heart
Explorer At Heart
Posts: 134
Joined: Wed Sep 23, 2015 6:24 pm

Re: "Realistic" CGI models in webteases - thoughts ?

Post by spaisin »

Can't really offer anything on the tools you're using, sounds like a "character creator" of some sort ? On that front I ran into a pretty simple looking 3D modelling "lab" for humanoid characters: ( http://www.manuelbastioni.com/ ), the gallery pics look pretty damn awesome - I think it works basically on "sliders" to select features. But, it is meant for actual 3D modelling (in blender), so the effort required is probably a tad higher, especially as 3D modelling software can be a bit unintuitive...

As for using those images in a webtease .. hmm, sure. They don't look Real, but hey, hentai seems pretty popular ... :-) Hot enough anyway. And as they look cartoonish, you can/(should?) freely use that for scripting, easier to "believe" silly stories when the context is virtual.. mix in some real pics for added confusion .. :-)
mangoman
Explorer At Heart
Explorer At Heart
Posts: 347
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 9:12 pm
Gender: Male
Sexual Orientation: Straight
I am a: Slave
Location: Krakosia
Contact:

Re: "Realistic" CGI models in webteases - thoughts ?

Post by mangoman »

I'm not jerking off to CGI.
User avatar
Shattered
Experimentor
Experimentor
Posts: 1238
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2013 6:41 pm
I am a: Switch
Location: United Kingdom

Re: "Realistic" CGI models in webteases - thoughts ?

Post by Shattered »

paswis wrote: Sat Aug 25, 2018 7:15 pm I'm not jerking off to CGI.
;-)
mangoman
Explorer At Heart
Explorer At Heart
Posts: 347
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 9:12 pm
Gender: Male
Sexual Orientation: Straight
I am a: Slave
Location: Krakosia
Contact:

Re: "Realistic" CGI models in webteases - thoughts ?

Post by mangoman »

Shattered wrote: Sat Aug 25, 2018 10:42 pm
paswis wrote: Sat Aug 25, 2018 7:15 pm I'm not jerking off to CGI.
;-)
Ha, whats up?
User avatar
hosenguy
Explorer At Heart
Explorer At Heart
Posts: 321
Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2015 11:22 pm
Gender: Male
I am a: None of the above

Re: "Realistic" CGI models in webteases - thoughts ?

Post by hosenguy »

paswis wrote: Sat Aug 25, 2018 7:15 pm I'm not jerking off to CGI.
Hmmmm? I have.
How about this?
https://www.pornhub.com/view_video.php? ... 495d359dd6
doyouevenodd
Explorer
Explorer
Posts: 33
Joined: Sat Jun 16, 2018 3:14 am

Re: "Realistic" CGI models in webteases - thoughts ?

Post by doyouevenodd »

Sometimes I don't mind the CGI cause I can open some other pron in a different window :)
User avatar
MisterFlames
Explorer At Heart
Explorer At Heart
Posts: 145
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2018 2:44 pm
Gender: Male
Sexual Orientation: Straight
I am a: Switch

Re: "Realistic" CGI models in webteases - thoughts ?

Post by MisterFlames »

I don't mind CGI.

But I'm not sure if motionless and "low-quality" CGI would be enough for me. The two examples might be interesting to portray something like an AI to tease you for one or two scenes. I would need much more details to enjoy them in a greater scale than that.

If there are 3d models with enough quality, I would surely give it a go though.
anonymister
Explorer At Heart
Explorer At Heart
Posts: 178
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2014 2:11 am
Gender: Male
Sexual Orientation: Straight
I am a: Submissive

Re: "Realistic" CGI models in webteases - thoughts ?

Post by anonymister »

I am not interested in CGI currently. Maybe petite, relistic small breasts.

For photo sets, have you tried Fuskator ?
User avatar
Devilish Domina
Explorer
Explorer
Posts: 25
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2018 8:36 am
Gender: Female
Sexual Orientation: Bisexual/Bi-Curious
I am a: Domme (Female)
Contact:

Re: "Realistic" CGI models in webteases - thoughts ?

Post by Devilish Domina »

I wonder if there is an appetite for video game teases in VR? It would be a highly specialized niche, but much more immersive and interactive than web teases can be? But it would rely on CGI models.

Is anyone here a fan of VR rendered porn?
mangoman
Explorer At Heart
Explorer At Heart
Posts: 347
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 9:12 pm
Gender: Male
Sexual Orientation: Straight
I am a: Slave
Location: Krakosia
Contact:

Re: "Realistic" CGI models in webteases - thoughts ?

Post by mangoman »

Devilish Domina wrote: Sun Sep 09, 2018 4:33 am I wonder if there is an appetite for video game teases in VR? It would be a highly specialized niche, but much more immersive and interactive than web teases can be? But it would rely on CGI models.

Is anyone here a fan of VR rendered porn?
I dont have VR Glasses but I'm looking forward to the future and all its porn possibilities :)
User avatar
Devilish Domina
Explorer
Explorer
Posts: 25
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2018 8:36 am
Gender: Female
Sexual Orientation: Bisexual/Bi-Curious
I am a: Domme (Female)
Contact:

Re: "Realistic" CGI models in webteases - thoughts ?

Post by Devilish Domina »

paswis wrote: Sun Sep 09, 2018 6:44 pm
Devilish Domina wrote: Sun Sep 09, 2018 4:33 am I wonder if there is an appetite for video game teases in VR? It would be a highly specialized niche, but much more immersive and interactive than web teases can be? But it would rely on CGI models.

Is anyone here a fan of VR rendered porn?
I dont have VR Glasses but I'm looking forward to the future and all its porn possibilities :)
Oh bummer! Yes, it's not technology that's common in every household yet. There is a trailer if you want to check it out and give feedback. I posted about it in the Tease Software forum.
Latexscatzofe
Curious Newbie
Curious Newbie
Posts: 3
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2018 11:25 am

Re: "Realistic" CGI models in webteases - thoughts ?

Post by Latexscatzofe »

i LOVE VR ;)
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 40 guests